Short answer: Inspect molded pulp trays against an approved sample and written specification. Check dimensions at agreed points, product fit, edges and surface, nesting, and carton condition. Record the lot, method and result; do not invent a tolerance after delivery.
Keep one signed-off production sample, the drawing revision and the specification together. The drawing should identify the points that matter to the product: overall length and width, cavity depth, locating features, and any clearance around sensitive surfaces. Fiber parts can show normal variation, so the buyer and supplier should agree the measurement method and permitted range before ordering.

Do not compare a tray with an early prototype and call every difference a defect. Tooling and process changes may have been approved in between. Mark the approved revision and retain a dated sample for both sides.
At receiving, record the supplier, purchase order, production lot, arrival date and carton condition. Then check a sample selected under the quality plan agreed for the order. A practical inspection sheet can include:
Natural-fiber surfaces are not identical to injection-molded plastic. Put clear examples in the visual standard: acceptable texture, color range, edge condition and examples that are not acceptable. A rough area hidden from view may be harmless; the same area on a contact surface could shed fibers or mark the product. Judge it against the agreed use, not by an undefined preference for a “perfect” surface.
When a result fails, quarantine the affected lot, photograph the issue beside a scale, record the sample and cavity position, and ask for a containment and corrective-action response. Avoid sorting or reworking product until both parties agree on the disposition.
An incoming visual check does not replace a distribution test. If the package protects a fragile item, confirm the approved test plan, filled package, outer carton and shipping route. ASTM describes its D5276 free-fall drop test as a method for evaluating a container and inner packaging under drop impact; ISTA test procedures cover broader transport simulations. Select a procedure with the responsible packaging or test team.
HTAECO can review a drawing and representative product as part of a custom molded-pulp packaging brief. For category examples, see pulp trays and gift boxes. Send the drawing revision, sample size and defect photos through the contact page.
Start by confirming the carton label, production lot, part number and revision. Select samples using the agreed plan before parts are mixed with another lot. Let parts reach the agreed inspection condition, especially if moisture or storage can affect dimensions. Use the same measurement points and method each time; record the instrument or gauge when it matters to the result.
A practical sequence is: overall dimensions, key cavity points, product fit, edge and surface review, nesting, then carton condition. Place the product in the tray in the intended orientation and check that it seats without force. Look for rocking, sharp edges, blocked features, loose fibers on a critical face and damage from stacking. Compare appearance with the approved sample under the agreed lighting instead of judging each piece from memory.
For every finding, note the sample number, location, measurement, photograph and decision. Classify the issue by its effect: functional fit, protection, handling, appearance or documentation. This helps the supplier focus on a root cause rather than debating whether a mark is “normal.” If a result is outside the agreed limit, identify and hold the affected quantity while the buyer and supplier decide on disposition. Do not change the acceptance limit after inspection simply to clear a shipment.
Keep one retained sample from accepted lots when the project requires it. A dated record makes trend review possible and gives both teams a clear reference when a later shipment looks different.
Include the lot and revision, sample selection method, measurement points, actual readings, visual criteria, fit result, photographs and disposition. The acceptance limits should come from the approved specification.
Not automatically. Assess its location and effect on appearance, product contact, fiber shedding and package performance against the agreed visual standard.